Late last month, the Saskatchewan court released the records as a result of a court application by The Globe and Mail and the CBC. In 2015, Judge Neil Gabrielson of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in Regina ruled that the government had indeed agreed to a full release from the church’s obligations, in effect liberating the Catholic Church from its remaining financial commitments. In their e-mails, they say that they had negotiated a narrower release, which would only have covered the outstanding $1.6-million. Government lawyers, meanwhile, maintained that this was not what they had agreed to. In the documents, church lawyers argue that the government had agreed, in exchange for the $1.2-million, to completely release the church from all of its remaining settlement obligations. But a dispute emerged over the terms of the deal. At the time, those included more than $21-million that the church was required to make “best efforts” to obtain through fundraising, and a separate $1.6-million in cash commitments.Įventually, the two parties agreed on a $1.2-million payment from the church. Included in the files are e-mail exchanges between lawyers for the Catholic Church and the federal government in which they discuss the status of the church’s unpaid obligations to survivors under the settlement. They have long been sought by academics and experts studying the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, a significant 2006 legal deal that provided restitution to residential school survivors. The records were filed in 20, but not previously made available to the public. The details of the church’s campaign are revealed in newly released court records, which The Globe and Mail fought to obtain. The Catholic Church aggressively pursued a release from the millions of dollars it owed to residential school survivors, while claiming that government efforts to collect the money would be fruitless because there was none left. More information about this "challenge" is in the Due Diligence OSH Answers document.Please log in to bookmark this story. On the other hand, the challenge for the employers is to know when they have fulfilled all appropriate regulatory requirements. These general provisions give employers the "freedom" to carry out measures and control procedures that are appropriate for their individual workplaces. Please see the OSH Answers document OH&S Legislation in Canada - Basic Responsibilities for more information. Promotes safety culture and communication.Establishes responsibility sharing systems.Internal responsibility system does the following: Instead, it holds employers responsible for determining such steps to ensure health and safety of all workers. Acts and regulations do not always impose or prescribe the specific steps to take for compliance. Its foundation is that everyone in the workplace - both workers and employers - is responsible for his or her own safety and for the safety of co-workers. The internal responsibility system is the underlying philosophy of the occupational health and safety legislation in all Canadian jurisdictions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |